Exposing Islam

15 Critical Questions About Islam
Unmasking the Myth: A Forensic Challenge to Core Islamic Claims

1. The Invention of the Islamic Jesus: A Fabricated Messiah

The Qur’an presents a version of Jesus (Isa) that starkly contrasts with every historical and textual source before it. Gone is the crucified, risen Christ of the Gospels—replaced by a docile prophet who neither dies nor rises (Qur’an 4:157). Yet Tacitus, Josephus, the Talmud, and early Christian martyrdom accounts unanimously affirm the crucifixion. Islam’s Isa lacks historical grounding and theological coherence—he’s not a correction, but a contrivance.

2. Allah: The Repurposed Deity of Pagan Arabia

Long before Muhammad, “Allah” was already worshipped by Meccan tribes as a high god among many. Inscriptions from Nabataean and South Arabian sites prove the name’s pre-Islamic usage. The Qur’an itself confirms Arab familiarity with al-Lat, al-Uzza, and Manat (53:19–20). Islam didn’t reveal a new deity; it rebranded a pre-existing one, selectively stripping him of his polytheistic context.

3. (See Crumbling Core #7–9)

Already covered in-depth.

4. From Mecca to Medina: The Evolution of Muhammad’s Message

Early Meccan surahs emphasize patience, spirituality, and coexistence. Once in Medina, the tone hardens: calls to war, political dominance, and subjugation of non-Muslims emerge. This radical shift isn’t just tactical—it’s theological, with abrogation (Qur’an 2:106) used to overwrite earlier verses. Islam’s “unchanging” message morphs based on political expediency.

5. Was Muhammad Literate? Deconstructing the ‘Unlettered Prophet’ Myth

The Qur’an (7:157–158) calls Muhammad “al-ummi,” often translated as “illiterate.” But the word also means “Gentile” or “unscriptured.” Hadiths contradict this idea: Muhammad writes letters, seals documents, and interacts with scribes. Portraying him as illiterate served a purpose—it shielded him from accusations of copying previous scriptures. But the historical record doesn't support this narrative.

6. The Qur’an’s Use of Apocryphal Sources: Plagiarism or Revelation?

Many Qur’anic stories are absent from canonical scriptures yet align with Jewish midrashim and Christian apocrypha. The clay bird miracle (Surah 3:49) comes from the Infancy Gospel of Thomas. Mary’s palm tree labor (Surah 19:23–26) appears in the Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew. These were known texts circulating in the region—suggesting borrowing, not revelation.

7. The Myth of the ‘Final Revelation’: Islam’s Chronological Insecurity

The Qur’an claims to confirm previous scriptures (5:48), yet accuses Jews and Christians of corruption (2:75, 3:78). If it affirms the Torah and Gospel, why contradict them? Islam claims to “seal” revelation (33:40), yet its narrative lacks continuity with historical Judaism and Christianity. The result is neither final nor consistent—it’s a theological reboot with conflicting files.

8. The Problem of the Missing Torah and Gospel

The Qur’an praises the Torah and Gospel as divine guidance (5:44–47) but never names the books it claims to confirm. Muslims argue these texts are “lost” or “corrupted”—yet no record of such corruption exists before Islam. Early Christians and Jews fiercely preserved their texts. Islam’s accusation arrives centuries too late, unsupported by history.

9. The Role of Jinn in the Qur’an: Superstition as Theology

Invisible, shape-shifting spirits (jinn) populate the Qur’an (Surah 72), with some allegedly converting to Islam. Pre-Islamic Arabs already believed in such beings. The Qur’an legitimizes these folk beliefs instead of dispelling them. How can a religion claiming rational monotheism center supernatural folklore in its theology?

10. The Qur’an’s Women Problem: Eternal Inequality

Surah 4:34 sanctions male dominance—men may “strike” their wives if disobedient. Women inherit half a man’s share (4:11), and their testimony is worth less (2:282). Apologists argue “context,” but the Qur’an presents these rules as timeless. Unlike evolving human rights, Islam locks inequality into divine law—unchangeable and systemic.

11. Did Muhammad Exist? A Forensic Look at the Historical Record

Outside of Islamic texts, the historical trail is faint. No contemporary Roman, Persian, or Byzantine source mentions Muhammad during his lifetime. Coins and inscriptions bearing his name appear only decades later. Even within Islamic tradition, contradictions abound between Ibn Ishaq, Tabari, and hadith collections. The historical Muhammad is a silhouette—mostly constructed in hindsight.

12. Islam and Slavery: The Unreformed Legacy

The Qur’an regulates, but never abolishes, slavery. Captives could be taken in war (8:67), women enslaved and used sexually (23:6, 4:24). Muhammad himself owned and traded slaves. While Christianity eventually birthed abolition movements, Islam institutionalized slavery in sharia, uninterrupted for centuries. There’s no call for manumission—only management.

13. The Qur’an’s Mathematical Errors: Divine Revelation or Human Mistake?

Surah 4:11–12 outlines inheritance shares that mathematically exceed the estate. When a wife, daughters, and parents inherit, their allotted fractions add up to more than 100%. This isn’t metaphor—it’s law. Medieval scholars strained to fix the sums, but no divine author should need correction. It’s a human glitch in a book claiming perfection.

14. Progressive Revelation or Regressive Contradiction? Abrogation as Collapse

Qur’an 2:106 claims that Allah replaces verses as needed. But why would eternal truth require deletion? Abrogation allows contradictions between peace (2:256) and violence (9:5) to coexist—by retroactively canceling the former. That’s not clarity; it’s theological chaos. “No change in Allah’s words” (6:34)? The Qur’an does exactly that.

15. Muhammad’s Privileges: A Prophet Above the Law

Surah 33:50 grants Muhammad special sexual privileges—marrying as many women as he pleases, including female captives. No other believer may do the same. He also received exclusive legal exemptions: taking war booty (8:1), marrying his adopted son’s ex-wife (33:37). These aren’t divine commands—they’re personalized permissions. Prophethood becomes a license to indulge.

Conclusion: A Faith Fractured by Its Own Foundations

Each of these fifteen entries strikes at a different pillar of Islam’s self-image—its prophet, its scripture, its morality, its origins. The result isn’t a set of theological quirks, but a pattern of systemic inconsistencies, historical borrowings, and moral dissonance. When a religion must rewrite history, excuse its prophet, and adjust revelation midstream, it doesn’t stand on divine truth—but on crafted narrative.