Exposing Islam

🧱 The Quran’s Collapse from Within:

When a Book Undermines Itself

“If it had been from other than Allah, they would have found within it much contradiction.”
— Surah 4:82

This verse throws down a divine gauntlet — a public challenge. It invites scrutiny. And so, we took the Quran up on its own test. After a deep, meticulous series of investigations into Quranic verses, historical claims, and doctrinal foundations, the conclusion is simple, sharp, and unflinching:

Islam doesn’t just suffer from contradictions.

It is built on them.

This isn’t an outsider’s attack. It’s the Quran dismantling itself.

Part I: 📉 The Quran Fails Its Own Divine Standard

Surah 4:82 offers a falsification criterion. If contradictions exist, the book isn’t divine. Here’s the contradiction list that obliterates its credibility:

🚫 The Pharaoh’s Death

Surah 10:92 – “We will deliver your body.”
Surah 26:66 – “We drowned Pharaoh and his troops.”

Was Pharaoh saved or killed? Muslims claim “delivered” means the body floated. But if he was killed and his body floated, why did Allah say "We will deliver your body" like it's a divine act, instead of just letting nature do what it does?

Contradiction Level: Conceptual & interpretive.
Outcome: Internal incoherence.

📜 People of the Book Must Judge by Their Scriptures — But Are Cursed if They Do

Surah 5:43: "How do they come to you (Muhammad) for judgment, when they have the Torah?"
Surah 5:47: "Let the People of the Gospel judge by what Allah has revealed therein."
Surah 5:68: "You have nothing until you uphold the Torah and Gospel."
Surah 3:85: "Whoever seeks a religion other than Islam—it will never be accepted."

So which is it?

Judge by the Torah & Gospel = obey Allah?
Or follow the Torah & Gospel = disbelieve in Islam?

You can't do both. The Quran affirms and condemns you simultaneously.

Contradiction Level: Theological, practical, and moral.
Outcome: Islam becomes self-nullifying.

🥇 The “First Muslim” Paradox

Adam (Surah 2:37): First human = first to submit.
Abraham (Surah 2:131): “I have submitted.”
Moses (Surah 7:143): “I am the first of the believers.”
Muhammad (Surah 6:163): “And I am the first of the Muslims.”

You can’t all be first.

Contradiction Level: Historical timeline & identity.
Outcome: Disqualifies its own chronology.

🏆 Jesus' Followers Were Victorious — But Also Corrupted?

Surah 61:14: “We supported those who believed (in Jesus) until they became dominant.”
Islamic claim: Christianity was corrupted early, thus needed correction via Islam.
But history shows Christianity dominated the Roman world by the 4th century — long before Muhammad.

So:

If they became dominant, Allah made falsehood win.
If their dominance was good, then Islam is redundant.

Contradiction Level: Historical-theological.
Outcome: One of Islam’s strongest legs snaps off.

Part II: 🛑 Islam’s Defenders Must Cheat Logic to Save It

To defend these contradictions, apologists use a tried and tired toolkit:

🔁 Special Pleading

“You can’t understand the Quran unless you read Arabic… and 14 centuries of tafsir… and ignore what it plainly says.”

So why did Allah call it a clear book revealed in plain Arabic?

🔄 Redefinition of Words

“Deliver your body” = float for 10 minutes, then disappear for centuries.

“Unchanged word of God” = applies only to the Quran, not earlier revelations (despite Surah 6:34, 10:64).

⛔ Blame the Reader

“You're not a scholar, so you can't judge it.”

But Surah 4:82 isn’t for scholars — it's for anyone who reflects.

Conclusion: The Quran fails unless defended by a religious elite who reinterpret the words of Allah on his behalf. That’s not divine clarity — that’s theological damage control.

Part III: 🧩 The Historical Narrative Falls Apart

Islam depends on the idea that:

All previous prophets preached Islam.
The Injeel and Torah were pure revelations.
But they got corrupted and Islam fixed it.

Problem?

There’s no historical or textual evidence of an “Islamic Injeel.”
The Torah and Gospels we have today were widespread long before Muhammad.
The Quran tells Jews and Christians to uphold them during Muhammad’s time (5:43–47).
But Surah 3:85 declares anything other than Islam is worthless.

You cannot affirm the Torah and Gospel… and then condemn those who follow them.

This isn’t confusion. It’s contradiction.

Part IV: 🔥 Islam Demands Logical Obedience — But Cannot Sustain It

Islam claims:

“We are rational. The Quran is logical. No contradictions allowed.”

But here’s the summary of the trap:

If you obey the Torah/Gospel	You’re disobeying Islam (3:85)
If you obey Islam	You’re disobeying the Torah/Gospel (5:43–47)
If you say Jesus' followers were true and victorious (61:14)	Then their faith (Christianity) was validated
If their faith was corrupted	Then Islam affirms a lie
If God’s word can’t change (6:34, 10:64)	Then the Torah & Gospel are still valid
If they’re not valid	Then the Quran affirms a corrupted book

🚨 Either way, Islam destroys itself.

Part V: 🔚 Conclusion — The Book That Broke Itself

Islam sets the rules:

No contradictions.
God's word is eternal.
The Quran is perfect.

We followed those rules. We didn’t invent problems — we read what the Quran says. And that’s what makes this fatal.

❌ The Quran collapses not because critics attacked it...
✅ It collapses because it contradicts itself.

That’s not a polemic. That’s a fact.

📌 Final Takeaway:

If a book contradicts itself, fails its own divine test, and requires reinterpretation to survive…

It cannot be divine.

And Islam — in its core doctrine — is not what it claims to be.