Saturday, July 5, 2025

 The Conspiracy of Islam

Power Disguised as Revelation

What if Islam wasn’t revealed — but reverse-engineered?
What if its scripture, laws, and traditions weren’t divine truths, but tools of empire — patched together to serve control, not truth?

Strip away the mystique, and what emerges is not a spiritual path —
but a political machine, built by men, cloaked in God’s name, and enforced with divine threats.

This isn’t speculation.
The Islamic sources themselves expose it.


1. Situational Revelation: A Prophet Who Legislates for Himself

The Qur’an claims to be a timeless message — yet it flexes to suit Muhammad’s personal desires.

  • Zaynab incident: When Muhammad lusted after his adopted son’s wife, a convenient revelation arrived:
    “We married her to you…” (Q 33:37).
    Sources like al-Tabari and Ibn Sa’d confirm this came after he saw her undressed and desired her.

  • Unlimited sexual privilege:
    Q 33:50 gives Muhammad exclusive rights to any woman who “offers herself,” plus captives and existing wives.
    Tafsir al-Qurtubi bluntly says: “This verse is only for the Prophet.”

  • Domestic disputes turned divine:
    When his wives challenged him over a concubine, a "revelation" (Q 66:3–5) threatened them with divorce and God's wrath.
    Ibn Kathir confirms this arose from jealousy.

This isn’t prophecy. It’s personal power cloaked as divine law.


2. A Qur’an of Contradictions, Lost Verses, and Borrowed Tales

Islam claims the Qur’an is preserved and perfect. The sources say otherwise.

  • Alcohol rulings:
    First tolerated (Q 2:219), then discouraged (Q 4:43), then banned (Q 5:90).
    Why would an all-knowing God need stages?

  • Lost revelations:
    Aisha reported that a stoning verse was lost — eaten by a sheep after Muhammad died (Sunan Ibn Majah 1944).

  • Copied stories:

    • Mary under the palm tree (Q 19:22–26) → from Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew

    • Jesus speaking as an infant (Q 19:29–30) → from Infancy Gospel of Thomas

    • The Seven Sleepers (Q 18:9–26) → from Christian folklore

Early Muslim historians like Ibn Ishaq and al-Tabari preserved conflicting versions of key events — exposing that the Qur’an wasn't preserved, it was edited, reworded, and politically curated.


3. The Hadith Machine: Empire’s Tool of Control

The Qur’an alone couldn’t govern an empire. That’s where hadith came in — not as revelation, but as a posthumous fabrication industry.

  • Bukhari supposedly sifted through 600,000 reports, accepting ~7,000 — over 200 years after Muhammad’s death, using invented criteria.

  • al-Daraqutni, a respected hadith critic, admitted many “authentic” narrations were flawed or false.

  • Ibn Abi Hatim and Ibn al-Jawzi documented hadith fabrication commissioned by rulers to sanctify their own power.

And while apologists claim hadith “clarify” the Qur’an, they often rewrite it:

  • Q 2:256 says “no compulsion in religion”
    → But Sahih Bukhari 6922: “Whoever changes his religion — kill him.”

  • The Qur’an never prescribes stoning.
    → But Sahih Muslim 1690 and Malik’s Muwatta do — and it became law.

Hadith served as a divine backdoor for authoritarianism.


4. From Revelation to Regime: The Empire Builds a Religion

After Muhammad’s death, Islam became the state’s weapon.

  • Abu Bakr used Muhammad’s name to crush tax revolts (Ridda Wars). These weren’t heretics — they were resisting political domination.

  • Umar centralized rule, citing hadith to justify law.

  • Umayyads fabricated hadith to elevate Arab supremacy.
    Abbasids canonized them to protect their rule.

By the Abbasid era, Islam had evolved into a totalitarian system:
Blasphemy laws. Death for apostasy.
And a Prophet rebranded not as a man — but a constitution.


5. Islam: The Perfect System of Control

Islam isn’t just a religion. It’s a total ideology — one that monitors, restricts, and disciplines every area of life.

  • Sharia dictates:

    • How to dress

    • How to eat

    • How to defecate

    • How to speak

    • Who to marry

    • Who to kill

  • Leave Islam?
    → Death penalty (Reliance of the Traveller, o8.1; Ibn Kathir; Qurtubi)

  • Criticize Muhammad?
    → Q 33:57–61 authorizes violence.
    → Ibn Taymiyya demanded death — even after repentance.

This is pre-modern authoritarianism, dressed in divine robes.


6. The Modern Whitewash: Islam 2.0 for Western Audiences

Today’s apologists come in suits, not armor. But their mission hasn’t changed:
Defend the system — whitewash the scripture.

They say: “Islam banned slavery.”
→ Q 4:24 and Q 23:5–6 permit sex with slaves. Muhammad owned them (Sahih Muslim 3371).

They say: “Muhammad was a feminist.”
→ Q 4:34 allows wife-beating.
→ Q 4:11 gives women half inheritance.
→ Q 2:282 says two women = one man in testimony.

They say: “Islam is compatible with science.”
→ Q 86:6–7 says semen comes from between the backbone and ribs.
→ Q 15:19 says the Earth is spread out — flat.

What’s happening here is simple:
A brutal ideology is being rebranded — to sell it in modern marketplaces without exposing its foundations.


🧠 Final Thought: The Lie That Wears a Halo

Islam presents itself as divine. But behind the façade lies:

  • A Prophet whose revelations serve his whims

  • A scripture stitched together from folklore and convenience

  • A hadith canon engineered for empire

  • A system built to demand obedience — not truth

This isn’t a religion that accidentally gained power.
It’s a coordinated conspiracy that succeeded — by wrapping dominance in divinity.

And the tragedy?
Millions still bow to it, believing it's from heaven.

No comments:

Post a Comment

  Islam — What It Really Is  (Once You Strip Away the PR) So let’s say someone asks you: “What  is  Islam really about?” Not the Sunday scho...