The Conspiracy of Islam
Power Disguised as Revelation
What if Islam wasn’t revealed — but reverse-engineered?
What if its scripture, laws, and traditions weren’t divine truths, but tools of empire — patched together to serve control, not truth?
Strip away the mystique, and what emerges is not a spiritual path —
but a political machine, built by men, cloaked in God’s name, and enforced with divine threats.
This isn’t speculation.
The Islamic sources themselves expose it.
1. Situational Revelation: A Prophet Who Legislates for Himself
The Qur’an claims to be a timeless message — yet it flexes to suit Muhammad’s personal desires.
Zaynab incident: When Muhammad lusted after his adopted son’s wife, a convenient revelation arrived:
“We married her to you…” (Q 33:37).
Sources like al-Tabari and Ibn Sa’d confirm this came after he saw her undressed and desired her.Unlimited sexual privilege:
Q 33:50 gives Muhammad exclusive rights to any woman who “offers herself,” plus captives and existing wives.
Tafsir al-Qurtubi bluntly says: “This verse is only for the Prophet.”Domestic disputes turned divine:
When his wives challenged him over a concubine, a "revelation" (Q 66:3–5) threatened them with divorce and God's wrath.
Ibn Kathir confirms this arose from jealousy.
This isn’t prophecy. It’s personal power cloaked as divine law.
2. A Qur’an of Contradictions, Lost Verses, and Borrowed Tales
Islam claims the Qur’an is preserved and perfect. The sources say otherwise.
Alcohol rulings:
First tolerated (Q 2:219), then discouraged (Q 4:43), then banned (Q 5:90).
Why would an all-knowing God need stages?Lost revelations:
Aisha reported that a stoning verse was lost — eaten by a sheep after Muhammad died (Sunan Ibn Majah 1944).Copied stories:
Mary under the palm tree (Q 19:22–26) → from Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew
Jesus speaking as an infant (Q 19:29–30) → from Infancy Gospel of Thomas
The Seven Sleepers (Q 18:9–26) → from Christian folklore
Early Muslim historians like Ibn Ishaq and al-Tabari preserved conflicting versions of key events — exposing that the Qur’an wasn't preserved, it was edited, reworded, and politically curated.
3. The Hadith Machine: Empire’s Tool of Control
The Qur’an alone couldn’t govern an empire. That’s where hadith came in — not as revelation, but as a posthumous fabrication industry.
Bukhari supposedly sifted through 600,000 reports, accepting ~7,000 — over 200 years after Muhammad’s death, using invented criteria.
al-Daraqutni, a respected hadith critic, admitted many “authentic” narrations were flawed or false.
Ibn Abi Hatim and Ibn al-Jawzi documented hadith fabrication commissioned by rulers to sanctify their own power.
And while apologists claim hadith “clarify” the Qur’an, they often rewrite it:
Q 2:256 says “no compulsion in religion”
→ But Sahih Bukhari 6922: “Whoever changes his religion — kill him.”The Qur’an never prescribes stoning.
→ But Sahih Muslim 1690 and Malik’s Muwatta do — and it became law.
Hadith served as a divine backdoor for authoritarianism.
4. From Revelation to Regime: The Empire Builds a Religion
After Muhammad’s death, Islam became the state’s weapon.
Abu Bakr used Muhammad’s name to crush tax revolts (Ridda Wars). These weren’t heretics — they were resisting political domination.
Umar centralized rule, citing hadith to justify law.
Umayyads fabricated hadith to elevate Arab supremacy.
Abbasids canonized them to protect their rule.
By the Abbasid era, Islam had evolved into a totalitarian system:
Blasphemy laws. Death for apostasy.
And a Prophet rebranded not as a man — but a constitution.
5. Islam: The Perfect System of Control
Islam isn’t just a religion. It’s a total ideology — one that monitors, restricts, and disciplines every area of life.
Sharia dictates:
How to dress
How to eat
How to defecate
How to speak
Who to marry
Who to kill
Leave Islam?
→ Death penalty (Reliance of the Traveller, o8.1; Ibn Kathir; Qurtubi)Criticize Muhammad?
→ Q 33:57–61 authorizes violence.
→ Ibn Taymiyya demanded death — even after repentance.
This is pre-modern authoritarianism, dressed in divine robes.
6. The Modern Whitewash: Islam 2.0 for Western Audiences
Today’s apologists come in suits, not armor. But their mission hasn’t changed:
Defend the system — whitewash the scripture.
They say: “Islam banned slavery.”
→ Q 4:24 and Q 23:5–6 permit sex with slaves. Muhammad owned them (Sahih Muslim 3371).
They say: “Muhammad was a feminist.”
→ Q 4:34 allows wife-beating.
→ Q 4:11 gives women half inheritance.
→ Q 2:282 says two women = one man in testimony.
They say: “Islam is compatible with science.”
→ Q 86:6–7 says semen comes from between the backbone and ribs.
→ Q 15:19 says the Earth is spread out — flat.
What’s happening here is simple:
A brutal ideology is being rebranded — to sell it in modern marketplaces without exposing its foundations.
🧠 Final Thought: The Lie That Wears a Halo
Islam presents itself as divine. But behind the façade lies:
A Prophet whose revelations serve his whims
A scripture stitched together from folklore and convenience
A hadith canon engineered for empire
A system built to demand obedience — not truth
This isn’t a religion that accidentally gained power.
It’s a coordinated conspiracy that succeeded — by wrapping dominance in divinity.
And the tragedy?
Millions still bow to it, believing it's from heaven.
No comments:
Post a Comment