Gospel Followers as a Present Community: A Polemic Misreading of Christian History

---

📖 Qur’anic Claim:

“Let the people of the Gospel judge by what Allah has revealed therein. Whoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed—it is those who are the defiantly disobedient.”
— Qur’an 5:47

The Qur’an presents a contemporary Christian community in the 7th century as still possessing the “Injil” (Gospel) and calls them to judge by it, implying it remains authoritative and divinely intact.

---

🏛️ Historical Problem:

This framing ignores the actual historical development of Christianity. By the 7th century CE:

• The Trinity, deity of Christ, atonement through crucifixion, and resurrection were core doctrines, affirmed by councils like Nicaea (325 CE) and Chalcedon (451 CE).

• The New Testament canon had long been finalized, and no Christian group adhered to anything resembling the Islamic concept of tawheed (pure monotheism denying Christ’s divinity).

⚠️ The Qur’an misrepresents Christian belief in two ways:

1. It treats contemporary Christians as if they still had access to the original, unaltered Gospel.

2. It assumes their faith should conform to the Islamic version of Jesus, which did not exist in any recognizable Christian community of the time.

---

📚 Key Contradiction:

If the Qur’an claims that the Gospel is still available and to be judged by (5:47), and that Christians are a legitimate community (5:82), then:

• Why does it also accuse them of blasphemy for saying “God is Christ” (5:17) and declare them as disbelievers (kuffar) in 5:72?

• And why does it denounce the Trinity (4:171, 5:73) if these were established doctrines of every extant Christian denomination at the time?

The Qur’an appears to be arguing against mainstream 7th-century Christianity, while still demanding that Christians follow a “Gospel” that no longer resembled its Islamic depiction—if it ever did.

---

🕰️ Implication: A Misplaced Polemic

• The Qur’an’s demand that Christians judge by the Injil shows that it:

  • Misunderstands the historical development of Christian doctrine.

  • Misrepresents the theological state of 7th-century Christianity.

  • Invents a lost, idealized Gospel that conforms to Islam’s theology, but no historical version ever did.

This creates a theological anachronism: the Qur’an speaks of “Gospel-believers” as if there exists a faithful Christian community still aligned with Jesus’ Islamicized teachings, despite zero historical or doctrinal continuity between 1st-century Jewish Christians and 7th-century Byzantine and Arab Christians.

---

🧩 What This Reveals:

• The Qur’anic Jesus (Isa) and Injil are reconstructions—not restorations.

• Muhammad was likely exposed to heretical sects (e.g., Ebionites, Nazarenes, or Syrian Gnostics) or oral traditions that distorted New Testament theology, leading to the creation of a non-historical version of Christianity.

• The Qur’an retrojects that version back onto history, then chastises contemporary Christians for not conforming to it.

---

🔚 Conclusion: Projection, Not Revelation

The Qur’an’s depiction of Gospel-following Christians as a still-existing faithful community is historically untenable. By Muhammad’s time, no such group existed that denied Christ’s divinity, accepted him as merely a prophet, and followed a non-Trinitarian Gospel. This reflects not divine insight, but a 7th-century Arabian misreading of Christianity, built on misinformation and theological polemic rather than historical reality.