Tuesday, April 15, 2025

📜 The Late Umayyad–Abbasid Myth-Making Machine: Inventing Muhammad and Islam

1. The Historical Silence (610–750 CE): The Myth’s Opportunity

  • Before 750 CE, no detailed biography of Muhammad exists. We only find vague mentions of a leader ("prophet" or "Mahmet") in texts like Doctrina Jacobi (c. 634–640 CE) and Sebeos (c. 660s), but none present:

    • A sinless, final prophet

    • A Qur’anic revelation

    • A sacred Mecca or Kaaba

  • The Qur’an itself doesn’t specify the name of Muhammad’s mother, wife, tribe (Quraysh is only mentioned without context), date of birth, or place of burial.

  • This historical vacuum allowed for post-event reconstruction—ideal for a regime needing religious legitimacy.


2. Why Myth-Making? Political Needs of Empire

Umayyad Realpolitik (661–750 CE)

  • The Umayyads ruled a vast Arab empire but lacked a robust religious framework.

  • Coins featured crosses and non-Islamic phrases until Abd al-Malik (r. 685–705 CE) initiated an Islamizing program:

    • Rebuilt the Dome of the Rock (691–692 CE) with inscriptions referring to “Muhammad” and denying Jesus’ divinity.

    • Shifted Arabic from a tribal identity to a religio-political identity under Islam.

    • Earliest coin explicitly saying “Muhammad is the messenger of God” dates to c. 692–696 CE—60 years after Muhammad’s death.

Abbasid Religious Engineering (Post-750 CE)

  • The Abbasids overthrew the Umayyads by claiming religious purity and descent from Muhammad’s uncle, Abbas.

  • To solidify power, they:

    • Sponsored massive hadith collection campaigns (e.g. Bukhari, Muslim in the 9th century).

    • Commissioned the first sira (biography) by Ibn Ishaq (d. 767), written over a century after Muhammad’s death.

    • Positioned Muhammad as the perfect lawgiver, prophet, and ideal human—unattested before.

    • Invented detailed isnads (chains of transmission) to retroactively authenticate stories.

  • These efforts created a unified doctrine that didn’t exist earlier—turning diverse Arab customs into a divine system.


3. Forensic Signs of Myth-Making

a. Late Biographies and Contradictory Hadiths

  • Ibn Ishaq’s Sira (earliest source on Muhammad’s life) was compiled 120–130 years later. Ibn Hisham’s version (d. 833) is even later, selectively edited.

  • Hadiths were rejected by earlier legal schools (e.g., Kufans) for being fabricated.

  • Multiple contradictory hadiths on:

    • Prayer times

    • Number of wives

    • Battles

    • The poisoning story and Muhammad’s death

b. Lack of External Corroboration

  • No external source confirms Muhammad as a founder of a new religion during his life.

  • Mecca and the Kaaba are absent from all Roman, Persian, Jewish, or Christian texts until after Islam is established.

c. Islamization of Arab Memory

  • Pre-Islamic figures (e.g. Abraham, Ishmael) were retrofitted into the Islamic narrative.

  • The Quran mentions “the prophet” but often ambiguously; later authors named him “Muhammad” to unify identity.

  • The Abbasids wrote genealogies linking Muhammad to Abraham, enhancing Arab religious status.


4. The Qur’an as an Evolving Text

  • Early Qur’anic manuscripts (e.g. Sana'a palimpsest) show:

    • Variants and corrections

    • No vowels or diacritics (making interpretation fluid)

  • No definitive “book” codex is attested before the late 7th century.

  • Standardization under Abd al-Malik or al-Hajjaj (not Uthman) aligns more with state control than prophetic preservation.


5. Why the Abbasids Needed a Perfect Prophet

  • Their claim to power was theologically fragile: descent from Abbas wasn’t enough.

  • Elevating Muhammad to a sinless, Gabriel-guided prophet turned him into a divine seal of legitimacy.

  • They centralized power through:

    • Sharia, built on hadiths

    • Madrasas, spreading Abbasid-approved doctrine

    • Suppression of sects (e.g., Mu’tazilites) that questioned hadith or prophethood


🧠 Logical Conclusion

The Islamic Muhammad (“A”)—the Gabriel-guided, sinless prophet delivering the Qur’an and founding Islam in Mecca—is not supported by contemporary records and emerges only through post-750 CE Abbasid narrative construction.

Conclusion: “A” is not historically verified but a political invention, shaped by late Umayyad symbolism and solidified through Abbasid myth-making.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Islam on Trial It Collapses Under Both External and Internal Critique “You can’t critique Islam unless you believe in it.” That’s the fam...