📜 The Late Umayyad–Abbasid Myth-Making Machine: Inventing Muhammad and Islam
1. The Historical Silence (610–750 CE): The Myth’s Opportunity
- 
Before 750 CE, no detailed biography of Muhammad exists. We only find vague mentions of a leader ("prophet" or "Mahmet") in texts like Doctrina Jacobi (c. 634–640 CE) and Sebeos (c. 660s), but none present: - 
A sinless, final prophet 
- 
A Qur’anic revelation 
- 
A sacred Mecca or Kaaba 
 
- 
- 
The Qur’an itself doesn’t specify the name of Muhammad’s mother, wife, tribe (Quraysh is only mentioned without context), date of birth, or place of burial. 
- 
This historical vacuum allowed for post-event reconstruction—ideal for a regime needing religious legitimacy. 
2. Why Myth-Making? Political Needs of Empire
Umayyad Realpolitik (661–750 CE)
- 
The Umayyads ruled a vast Arab empire but lacked a robust religious framework. 
- 
Coins featured crosses and non-Islamic phrases until Abd al-Malik (r. 685–705 CE) initiated an Islamizing program: - 
Rebuilt the Dome of the Rock (691–692 CE) with inscriptions referring to “Muhammad” and denying Jesus’ divinity. 
- 
Shifted Arabic from a tribal identity to a religio-political identity under Islam. 
- 
Earliest coin explicitly saying “Muhammad is the messenger of God” dates to c. 692–696 CE—60 years after Muhammad’s death. 
 
- 
Abbasid Religious Engineering (Post-750 CE)
- 
The Abbasids overthrew the Umayyads by claiming religious purity and descent from Muhammad’s uncle, Abbas. 
- 
To solidify power, they: - 
Sponsored massive hadith collection campaigns (e.g. Bukhari, Muslim in the 9th century). 
- 
Commissioned the first sira (biography) by Ibn Ishaq (d. 767), written over a century after Muhammad’s death. 
- 
Positioned Muhammad as the perfect lawgiver, prophet, and ideal human—unattested before. 
- 
Invented detailed isnads (chains of transmission) to retroactively authenticate stories. 
 
- 
- 
These efforts created a unified doctrine that didn’t exist earlier—turning diverse Arab customs into a divine system. 
3. Forensic Signs of Myth-Making
a. Late Biographies and Contradictory Hadiths
- 
Ibn Ishaq’s Sira (earliest source on Muhammad’s life) was compiled 120–130 years later. Ibn Hisham’s version (d. 833) is even later, selectively edited. 
- 
Hadiths were rejected by earlier legal schools (e.g., Kufans) for being fabricated. 
- 
Multiple contradictory hadiths on: - 
Prayer times 
- 
Number of wives 
- 
Battles 
- 
The poisoning story and Muhammad’s death 
 
- 
b. Lack of External Corroboration
- 
No external source confirms Muhammad as a founder of a new religion during his life. 
- 
Mecca and the Kaaba are absent from all Roman, Persian, Jewish, or Christian texts until after Islam is established. 
c. Islamization of Arab Memory
- 
Pre-Islamic figures (e.g. Abraham, Ishmael) were retrofitted into the Islamic narrative. 
- 
The Quran mentions “the prophet” but often ambiguously; later authors named him “Muhammad” to unify identity. 
- 
The Abbasids wrote genealogies linking Muhammad to Abraham, enhancing Arab religious status. 
4. The Qur’an as an Evolving Text
- 
Early Qur’anic manuscripts (e.g. Sana'a palimpsest) show: - 
Variants and corrections 
- 
No vowels or diacritics (making interpretation fluid) 
 
- 
- 
No definitive “book” codex is attested before the late 7th century. 
- 
Standardization under Abd al-Malik or al-Hajjaj (not Uthman) aligns more with state control than prophetic preservation. 
5. Why the Abbasids Needed a Perfect Prophet
- 
Their claim to power was theologically fragile: descent from Abbas wasn’t enough. 
- 
Elevating Muhammad to a sinless, Gabriel-guided prophet turned him into a divine seal of legitimacy. 
- 
They centralized power through: - 
Sharia, built on hadiths 
- 
Madrasas, spreading Abbasid-approved doctrine 
- 
Suppression of sects (e.g., Mu’tazilites) that questioned hadith or prophethood 
 
- 
🧠Logical Conclusion
The Islamic Muhammad (“A”)—the Gabriel-guided, sinless prophet delivering the Qur’an and founding Islam in Mecca—is not supported by contemporary records and emerges only through post-750 CE Abbasid narrative construction.
Conclusion: “A” is not historically verified but a political invention, shaped by late Umayyad symbolism and solidified through Abbasid myth-making.
 
No comments:
Post a Comment