Thursday, June 5, 2025

 ๐Ÿšจ Islam’s core theological claim faces a fatal contradiction

The Qur’an affirms the Torah and Gospel as uncorrupted, yet the Standard Islamic Narrative (SIN) and Hadith insist they’re textually altered. 

This isn’t a minor issue—it strikes at the heart of Islam’s coherence, especially for the Sunni majority (~85-90% of 2B Muslims). 

Buckle up for a deep dive into the evidence, history, and failed apologetics. 

No sugar-coating, just facts. ๐Ÿงต

๐Ÿ“œ The Qur’an’s Clear PositionThe Qur’an repeatedly affirms the Torah and Gospel as divine, valid, and uncorrupted during Muhammad’s time (7th c. CE):

  • 6:115: “The word of your Lord has been fulfilled in truth and justice. None can alter His words…”

    • Arabic: ูˆَุชَู…َّุชْ ูƒَู„ِู…َุฉُ ุฑَุจِّูƒَ ุตِุฏْู‚ًุง ูˆَุนَุฏْู„ًุง ู„َุง ู…ُุจَุฏِّู„َ ู„ِูƒَู„ِู…َุงุชِู‡ِ

    • Literal: No one can change (ู…ُุจَุฏِّู„َ, from ุจَุฏَّู„َ) God’s words (ูƒَู„ِู…َุงุชِู‡ِ), including prior revelations.

  • 15:9: “It is We Who have sent down the Reminder, and it is We Who will preserve it.”

    • Arabic: ุฅِู†َّุง ู†َุญْู†ُ ู†َุฒَّู„ْู†َุง ุงู„ุฐِّูƒْุฑَ ูˆَุฅِู†َّุง ู„َู‡ُ ู„َุญَุงูِุธُูˆู†َ

    • Literal: Allah preserves (ู„َุญَุงูِุธُูˆู†َ, from ุญَูِุธَ) the “Reminder” (ุงู„ุฐِّูƒْุฑَ), likely the Qur’an, possibly all scriptures (16:43, “People of the Reminder” = Jews/Christians).

  • 3:3: “He sent down the Torah and the Gospel…”

    • Arabic: ุฃَู†ْุฒَู„َ ุงู„ุชَّูˆْุฑَุงุฉَ ูˆَุงู„ْุฅِู†ْุฌِูŠู„َ

    • Literal: Torah/Gospel are divine revelations.

  • 5:47: “Let the People of the Gospel judge by what Allah has revealed therein…”

    • Arabic: ูَู„ْูŠَุญْูƒُู…ْ ุฃَู‡ْู„ُ ุงู„ْุฅِู†ْุฌِูŠู„ِ ุจِู…َุง ุฃَู†ْุฒَู„َ ูฑู„ู„َّู‡ُ ูِูŠู‡ِ

    • Literal: Christians must judge by their current Gospel (ูِูŠู‡ِ, “therein”).

  • 5:68: “You have no ground to stand upon unless you uphold the Torah and the Gospel…”

    • Arabic: ุญَุชَّู‰ٰ ุชُู‚ِูŠู…ُูˆุงْ ูฑู„ّุชَูˆْุฑَٰุฉَ ูˆَูฑู„ْุฅِู†ْุฌِูŠู„َ

  • 10:94: “If you are in doubt… ask those who read the Scripture before you…”

    • Arabic: ูَุณْุฆَู„ُูˆุงْ ุฃَู‡ْู„َ ูฑู„ْูƒِุชَุงุจِ ู‚َุจْู„َูƒَ

  • 5:13: “They distorted the words from their places…”

    • Arabic: ูŠُุญَุฑِّูُูˆู†َ ุงู„ْูƒَู„ِู…َ ุนَู†ْ ู…َูˆَุงุถِุนِู‡ِ

    • Literal: Interpretive distortion (ูŠُุญَุฑِّูُูˆู†َ, from ุญَุฑَّูَ), not textual corruption.

Key Point: The Qur’an affirms the Torah/Gospel’s textual integrity (6:115, 15:9) and commands their use (5:47, 10:94). No verse explicitly claims textual corruption—only interpretive misuse (5:13, 3:78: ูŠَู„ْูˆُูˆู†َ, “twisting tongues”).

๐Ÿ“– The SIN and Hadith: Textual Corruption (Tahrif al-Nass)The SIN, rooted in Sunni theology, claims Jews/Christians corrupted their scriptures, removing Muhammad’s mention:

  • Sahih Bukhari 9.93.629: “The people of the Scripture changed their Scripture…”

    • Literal: Textual alteration.

  • 2:79 (SIN Misreading): “So woe to those who write the Book with their own hands, then say, ‘This is from Allah,’ to barter it for a fleeting gain…”

    • Arabic: ูَูˆَูŠْู„ٌ ู„ِู„َّุฐِูŠู†َ ูŠَูƒْุชُุจُูˆู†َ ุงู„ْูƒِุชَุงุจَ ุจِุฃَูŠْุฏِูŠู‡ِู…ْ ุซُู…َّ ูŠَู‚ُูˆู„ُูˆู†َ ู‡َٰุฐَุง ู…ِู†ْ ุนِู†ْุฏِ ูฑู„ู„َّู‡ِ

    • SIN Claim: Jews/Christians altered Torah/Gospel’s text.

    • Actual Meaning: Condemns false writings (ุงู„ْูƒِุชَุงุจَ, indefinite, not ุงู„ุชَّูˆْุฑَุงุฉَ/ุงู„ْุฅِู†ْุฌِูŠู„َ), not divine scripture corruption.

Logical Contradiction: Unchangeable words (6:115: ู„َุง ู…ُุจَุฏِّู„َ) cannot be textually altered (Bukhari/SIN). Valid Torah/Gospel (5:47) contradict corruption claims. This violates the law of non-contradiction.

๐Ÿ•ฐ Historical Shift: From Early Clarity to Later DogmaEarly Islamic scholarship didn’t claim textual corruption:

  • Al-Tabari (d. 923 CE): 2:79 refers to fabricated books, not Torah/Gospel corruption. Aligns with 5:13 (ูŠُุญَุฑِّูُูˆู†َ) and 6:115.

  • Ibn Kathir (d. 1373 CE): 2:79 condemns false rabbinic rulings, not Torah alteration. “The real Torah… was not corrupted.”

But a shift occurred:

  • Ibn Hazm (d. 1064 CE): Andalusian scholar in Christian Spain. Argued textual corruption in Al-Fisal, citing Biblical contradictions (e.g., Jesus’ genealogy), anthropomorphism (God resting), and moral issues (prophets’ sins). Motivation: Counter Christian polemics, defend Qur’an’s finality (5:3).

  • Fakhr al-Din al-Razi (d. 1209 CE): Ash‘ari theologian. In Mafatih al-Ghayb, claimed scribes altered texts, citing Muhammad’s absence in the Bible. Motivation: Resolve rationalist/Christian challenges.

Why the Shift?

  • Doctrinal Need: Qur’an-Bible discrepancies (e.g., crucifixion, 4:157) and Muhammad’s absence required explanation. Corruption was easier than reconciliation.

  • Polemics: In al-Andalus/Crusader Levant, Christians used the Bible against Islam. Tahrif al-nass undermined their authority.

  • Theological Rigidity: Early fluidity gave way to exclusivism, codifying corruption by the 11th-13th centuries.

Impact: This shift, not Qur’anic, shaped the SIN, aligning with Bukhari 9.93.629 and misreading 2:79, creating a contradiction with 6:115, 5:47.

๐Ÿ›  Modern Apologetics: Digging a Deeper GraveModern apologists face an impossible task: reconciling Qur’anic affirmations (6:115, 5:47) with SIN’s corruption doctrine. Their tactics fail, compounding the contradiction:

  1. “Original Scriptures Lost”:

    • Claim: Qur’an’s Torah/Gospel are lost originals, not the Bible.

    • Flaw: 5:47 (ูِูŠู‡ِ, “therein”) commands Christians to judge by their current Gospel. 10:94 (ุฃَู‡ْู„َ ูฑู„ْูƒِุชَุงุจِ) refers to existing scriptures. No evidence of lost texts.

    • Backfire: Contradicts 6:115 (ู„َุง ู…ُุจَุฏِّู„َ) and 15:9 (ู„َุญَุงูِุธُูˆู†َ), implying Allah failed to preserve His words.

    • Grave: Undermines Qur’anic credibility, fatal to Sunni theology.

  2. “Partial Corruption” (Zakir Naik, Ahmed Deedat, Yasir Qadhi):

    • Claim: Some Bible parts (e.g., Paraclete = Muhammad) are true, others (e.g., crucifixion) corrupted.

    • Flaw: Arbitrary cherry-picking lacks objective criteria. Violates 6:115’s absolute unchangeability. Undermines 5:47’s holistic command.

    • Backfire: Destroys 3:3’s affirmation of entire Torah/Gospel (ุฃَู†ْุฒَู„َ).

    • Grave: Fractures Qur’anic coherence, fatal to divine preservation claims.

  3. “Tahrif al-Ma‘na” (Interpretive Distortion):

    • Claim: Bible text intact, but misinterpreted.

    • Flaw: Contradicts SIN/Bukhari 9.93.629’s textual corruption. Fails 2:79’s SIN reading (ูŠَูƒْุชُุจُูˆู†َ as alteration). Can’t explain Muhammad’s absence.

    • Backfire: Undermines Hadith authority, clashing with Sunni doctrine (Ibn Hazm, al-Razi).

    • Grave: Threatens Qur’an-Hadith synthesis, fatal to Sunni theology.

  4. “Gospels Aren’t the Gospel” (Mufti Menk, Hamza Tzortzis):

    • Claim: Qur’an’s Injil is a singular revelation to Jesus, not the four Gospels.

    • Flaw: 5:47 (ูِูŠู‡ِ) refers to Christians’ Gospel in Muhammad’s time (New Testament). No evidence of a “Gospel of Jesus.” Violates 6:115.

    • Backfire: Invents a lost text, undermining 15:9’s preservation.

    • Grave: Questions Qur’anic historicity, fatal to Sunni reliance on 5:47.

  5. “Divine Revelation, Human Transmission”:

    • Claim: Human error corrupted transmission.

    • Flaw: Contradicts 6:115 (ู„َุง ู…ُุจَุฏِّู„َ) and 15:9 (ู„َุญَุงูِุธُูˆู†َ). Undermines 5:47/10:94’s trust in existing scriptures.

    • Backfire: Raises doubts about Qur’anic preservation, a self-inflicted wound.

    • Grave: Negates divine omnipotence, fatal to 5:3’s finality.

Why Worse? Each tactic creates new contradictions (with 6:115, 5:47, Bukhari, or early tafsir), exposing the SIN’s disconnect from the Qur’an. Apologists’ desperation fractures Sunni coherence, alienating even Qur’an-only Muslims who accept 2:79’s corruption narrative.

๐Ÿ’ฅ Why Fatal to Islam?This contradiction devastates Islam’s mainstream (Sunni, ~85-90%):

  • Qur’anic Coherence: 6:115/5:47 vs. 2:79 (SIN)/Bukhari undermines divinity.

  • Divine Protection: Corruption implies Allah failed (6:115, 15:9).

  • Hadith Authority: Bukhari’s conflict threatens Sunni theology.

  • Finality: Valid Torah/Gospel (5:47) negate Qur’an’s necessity (5:3).

Broad Impact: The SIN’s 2:79 misreading is near-universal, even among Qur’an-only Muslims (<1%), making the contradiction pervasive. Minority sects (e.g., Shia, ~10-13%) vary, but Sunni dominance defines Islam’s global identity.

๐Ÿ”š The Grave DeepensThe SIN’s tahrif al-nass, a later invention (Ibn Hazm, al-Razi), not Qur’anic, clashes with early tafsir (Tabari, Ibn Kathir) and the Qur’an’s text. Apologists’ tactics—each more convoluted—dig Islam’s theological grave deeper, compounding contradictions. The Qur’an’s affirmation of uncorrupted scriptures (6:115, 5:47) can’t coexist with SIN/Bukhari’s corruption claim. This isn’t resolvable without rejecting Qur’anic verses, Hadith, or logic.

at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Islam: Does It Actually Hold Up?  Let’s Talk Honestly. Let’s be real for a second. If you strip away the slogans, the fear of “offending,” a...

  • (no title)
      The Islamic Dilemma: A Logical Examination of Quranic Claims About Previous Scriptures Introduction In interfaith dialogues between Christ...
  • (no title)
      The Corruption of the Bible: A Modern Islamic Myth? This analysis shows a major contradiction between early Islamic scholars and modern...
  • (no title)
      1️⃣ Islam Fails the Standard of Historical Evidence A true religion should be historically verifiable. However, many of Islam’s foundati...