Divine Patriarchy
Women According to the Qur’an
Welcome to the divine blueprint for half-worth humanity.
Before apologists rush in with cherry-picked verses about paradise and piety, let’s get one thing straight: the Qur’an is not neutral on women. It doesn’t elevate them. It doesn’t liberate them. It systematically reduces, regulates, and ranks them — all under the seal of divine perfection. This is not the moral evolution of a society grappling with injustice; it is a permanent theological entrenchment of patriarchal power. And the ink hasn’t faded.
Let’s start at the core.
📄 Created for Him, Not with Him
Forget the idea of mutual origin. While Qur’an 4:1 ambiguously says God “created you from a single soul,” classical tafsirs clarify what that really means: woman was made from man — for man. The foundational premise is simple: women exist as extensions of male purpose.
Tafsir al-Jalalayn:
“He created from it its mate [i.e., Eve from Adam]… that he might find repose in her.”
Ibn Kathir doubles down:
“She was created from his lowest left rib while he was asleep.”
Not partnership. Not equality. Utility.
No Qur'anic verse affirms woman as an independent moral agent with equal ontological status. She is derivative. Secondary. And the exegetical tradition never lets her forget it.
⚖️ Half the Value: Testimony, Inheritance, and Financial Dependence
Qur’an 2:282 — Testimony:
“And bring to witness two witnesses from among your men. If there are not two men, then a man and two women … so that if one of them errs, the other can remind her.”
This isn’t courtroom logistics. It’s a metaphysical downgrade. Women are presumed mentally or morally fallible — requiring backup.
Al-Qurtubi:
"Because women are subject to forgetfulness and deficiency of reason."
Muhammad himself, in Sahih Bukhari 2658, justifies this by declaring:
"I have seen that the majority of the dwellers of Hell-fire were women... because of their deficiency in religion and intellect."
This is not circumstantial law. It’s a reflection of revealed cosmology: Men are rational, women are defective.
Qur’an 4:11 — Inheritance:
“The male shall have the share of two females.”
Not based on financial contribution. Not merit. Just genitals.
No amount of apologetic tap dancing changes the arithmetic: women are born into legal inferiority. Period.
Qur’an 4:34 — Financial Dependence and Control:
“Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one more strength than the other, and because they support them from their means.”
This is the bedrock of patriarchal entitlement. Because men spend money, they rule. It’s divine capitalism with gender as capital.
🔨 Wifely Obedience and the Right to Beat
Now for the black hole of modern Islamic ethics: Qur’an 4:34.
“As to those [wives] on whose part you fear disobedience — admonish them, refuse to share their beds, and beat them (wa-id'ribuhunna)."
No crime committed. No proof required. Just fear of disobedience.
The Arabic verb "idrib" does not mean "symbolic gesture." It means strike. And every classical tafsir confirms it:
Al-Tabari:
"A light but painful beating that leaves no mark."
Ibn Kathir:
"It should not be severe... but it must be felt."
Al-Qurtubi:
"A beating that disciplines her without breaking bones or causing injury."
This is divine domestic violence policy. Codified. Normalized. Blessed.
Western apologetics like to claim this is rarely implemented. That’s not a defense. That’s a dodge. The theology stands.
🛏️ Sexual Ownership and Agrarian Analogies
Qur’an 2:223:
“Your wives are a tilth for you, so go into your tilth when and how you will.”
This is not poetic. It is economic control language. Women are compared to farmland. Men are the plowmen. Consent is not even a topic.
Tafsir Ibn Abbas:
"This means they are your property, so approach them as you please."
This theology of sexual submission underlies marital rape laws in many Islamic countries: i.e., there are none. The Qur’an erases a woman’s right to bodily autonomy in her own marriage.
Qur’an 23:5-6, 70:29-30:
“...except with their wives or those their right hands possess.”
Translation: Sex with wives and slaves is halal. No consent. No contract. Just ownership.
🛠️ Divorce, Custody, and Male Privilege
Qur’an 2:228:
"And women shall have rights similar to the rights against them... but men have a degree over them."
That degree? Legal supremacy.
Men can pronounce divorce unilaterally. Women must beg the court and forfeit financial rights.
Custody? Post-weaning, the child defaults to the father.
Tafsir al-Mawardi:
"Because the child inherits the religion and lineage of the father."
This isn’t spiritual equality. It’s gendered disenfranchisement, with God as guarantor.
🔥 Paradise and the Afterlife Hierarchy
In Islamic heaven:
Men are promised houris — eternal virgins with swelling breasts (Qur’an 78:33).
Women are promised... nothing specific, and only if their husbands let them in.
Sahih Bukhari 5196:
“If a woman dies while her husband was pleased with her, she will enter Paradise.”
Not justice. Patriarchy made eternal.
⚠️ Final Reality Check
The Qur’an didn’t hint at patriarchy. It canonized it.
Every misogynistic policy in Islamic governance — from child marriage to marital rape, from veil enforcement to courtroom injustice — has a verse to back it up.
This isn’t cultural baggage. It’s doctrinal blueprint.
🔪 Verdict: The Qur’an Doesn’t Elevate Women. It Enslaves Them.
From legal inferiority to domestic violence, from sexual subjugation to theological erasure, the Qur’an does not whisper about women’s secondary status. It declares it openly.
And when divine orders become constitutional law, the result isn’t devotion. It’s systemic misogyny with prophetic cover.
⚠️ Disclaimer
This post critiques Islam as an ideology, doctrine, and historical system — not Muslims as individuals. Every human deserves dignity. Beliefs do not. Truth-telling is not hate. Silence is.
No comments:
Post a Comment